Pages
- About Us
- Competition & Antitrust Laws
- Contact Us
- Copyright Law
- Corporate Laws
- Design Act
- Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
- Employment & Labour Law
- Events
- Home
- Intellectual Property Law
- Litigation
- Our Services
- Patent Law
- Privacy Policy
- Publications
- Real Estate & Infra
- Research at Infidem
- Site Map
- Trademark Law
Posts by category
- Category: Expertise Competetion-Antitrust Insights
- Category: Expertise Copyright Law Insights
- Category: Expertise Copyright Law News
- Category: Expertise Corporate Law News
- “Ministry Of Corporate Affairs Notifies The Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Insolvency and Liquidation Proceedings of Financial Service Providers and Application to Adjudication Authority) Rules, 2019.”
- Company against which money laundering case has been initiated cannot be allowed to be a member of CoC to be a oar
- Amendments to FDI Policy 2019
- Category: Expertise Design Act Insights
- Category: Expertise Employment & Labour Law News
- Category: Expertise Intellectual Property Law Insights
- Category: Expertise Intellectual Property Law News
- Category: Expertise Patent Law Global
- Category: Expertise Patent Law Insights
- Category: Expertise Patent Law News
- Category: Expertise Real Estate & Infra Global
- Category: Expertise Real Estate & Infra Insights
- Category: Expertise Trademark Law Insights
- Category: Expertise Trademark Law News
- Delhi High Court sets aside order restraining E-commerce platforms from selling goods of Direct Selling Enterprises
- Draft National E- Commerce Policy
- An unregistered Assignment Deed holds no validity under the Trademarks Act, 1999; Court need not hold trial in a commercial suit if Defendant lacks a real prospect of success.
- Category: Home Business & Regulatory
- Category: Home Legal
- A Financial Creditor cannot challenge the insolvency proceedings initiated by another financial creditor on the ground of superior claim. (NCLAT)
- Employee should know service rules not for employer to advice about it. (Supreme Court)
- Trademark Infringement: 12 Firms banned from selling Patanjali goods in International market. (Delhi High Court)
- Abuse on account of collective dominance not recognised by Indian Competition regime. (Competition Commission of India.)
- Category: Home Reports & News
- Category: Reasearch News Alert
- Category: Reasearch Publications
- Category: Research Insights
- Category: Uncategorized